<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Noose Tightens around PayPerPost?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/</link>
	<description>The Investment Wiki Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Dr. Dan!

Suddenly, I&#039;m thirsty for Pepsi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Dr. Dan!</p>
<p>Suddenly, I&#8217;m thirsty for Pepsi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drdanbhcmg</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>drdanbhcmg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-910</guid>
		<description>I think (Pepsi) PPP should not (Ford) have to disclose (IBM) their bias. I love (Wii)
reading good (Costco) Blogs full of (EXXON) opiniond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think (Pepsi) PPP should not (Ford) have to disclose (IBM) their bias. I love (Wii)<br />
reading good (Costco) Blogs full of (EXXON) opiniond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview with PayPerPost VC Dan Rua &#171; ValueWiki Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Interview with PayPerPost VC Dan Rua &#171; ValueWiki Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-759</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers for product mentions and reviews. The company has received negative press from bloggers, including myself, who consider the practice unethical. I decided it is only fair to give PayPerPost an opportunity to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers for product mentions and reviews. The company has received negative press from bloggers, including myself, who consider the practice unethical. I decided it is only fair to give PayPerPost an opportunity to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out that PPP blog post, Dan.  I may blog about it tomorrow, to give PPP&#039;s side of the story.

For the record, I do think PPP is shady, and the new RMP idea gives me the willies.  But I do think it&#039;s fair to present both sides.

Thanks for posting,

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out that PPP blog post, Dan.  I may blog about it tomorrow, to give PPP&#8217;s side of the story.</p>
<p>For the record, I do think PPP is shady, and the new RMP idea gives me the willies.  But I do think it&#8217;s fair to present both sides.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting,</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VC Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>VC Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuewiki.com/2007/03/20/the-noose-tightens-around-payperpost/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll enjoy Ted&#039;s latest post at http://blog.payperpost.com/ .  My comment there may also be enlightening.

PayPerPost&#039;s disclosure mandate and review process enables every WOMMA member to guarantee disclosure exactly as required by their WOMMA or corporate guidelines.  In fact, no other marketplace makes that possible for online marketers.

Therefore, this is more of a competitive spat with a couple WOMMA founders from the buzz marketing space than it is about the members you listed above -- they can all use PPP in full accordance with WOMMA policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll enjoy Ted&#8217;s latest post at <a href="http://blog.payperpost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.payperpost.com/</a> .  My comment there may also be enlightening.</p>
<p>PayPerPost&#8217;s disclosure mandate and review process enables every WOMMA member to guarantee disclosure exactly as required by their WOMMA or corporate guidelines.  In fact, no other marketplace makes that possible for online marketers.</p>
<p>Therefore, this is more of a competitive spat with a couple WOMMA founders from the buzz marketing space than it is about the members you listed above &#8212; they can all use PPP in full accordance with WOMMA policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
